Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation: Utility of Additional Sections and Immunohistochemical Analysis of Prostatic Needle Biopsies

Authors Information
Article Notes and Dates
To Cite : Arista-Nasr J, Martínez-Mijangos O, Martínez-Benítez B, Bornstein- Quevedo L, Lino-Silva S, et al. Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation: Utility of Additional Sections and Immunohistochemical Analysis of Prostatic Needle Biopsies, Nephro-Urol Mon. 2012 ;4(2):443-447. doi: 10.5812/numonthly.2067.
Abstract
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Cheville JC, Reznicek MJ, Bostwick DG. The focus of “atypical glands, suspicious for malignancy” in prostatic needle biopsy specimens: incidence, histologic features, and clinical followup of cases diagnosed in a community practice. Am J Clin Pathol. 1997; 108(6): 633-40[PubMed]
  • 2. Iczkowski KA, MacLennan GT, Bostwick DG. Atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for malignancy in prostate needle biopsies: clinical significance in 33 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1997; 21(12): 1489-95[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Girasole CR, Cookson MS, Putzi MJ, Chang SS, Smith JA, Jr., Wells N, et al. Significance of atypical and suspicious small acinar proliferations, and high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on prostate biopsy: implications for cancer detection and biopsy strategy. J Urol. 2006; 175(3 Pt 1): 929-33[DOI]
  • 4. Chan TY, Epstein JI. Follow-up of atypical prostate needle biopsies suspicious for cancer. Urology. 1999; 53(2): 351-5[DOI]
  • 5. Iczkowski KA, Bostwick DG. Criteria for biopsy diagnosis of minimal volume prostatic adenocarcinoma: analytic comparison with nondiagnostic but suspicious atypical small acinar proliferation. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000; 124(1): 98-107[PubMed]
  • 6. Renshaw AA. Adequate tissue sampling of prostate core needle biopsies. Am J Clin Pathol. 1997; 107(1): 26-9[PubMed]
  • 7. Reyes AO, Humphrey PA. Diagnostic effect of complete histologic sampling of prostate needle biopsy specimens. Am J Clin Pathol. 1998; 109(4): 416-22[PubMed]
  • 8. Bonney WW, Robinson RA, Lachenbruch PA, Culp DA. Yield of cancer tissue from prostatic needle biopsy. Urology. 1987; 29(2): 153-6[DOI]
  • 9. Arista-Nasr J, Keirns C. The focus of “atypical glands, suspicious for malignancy” in prostatic needle biopsy specimens. Am J Clin Pathol. 1998; 110(3): 409[PubMed]
  • 10. Arista-Nasr J, Martinez-Mijangos O, Martinez-Benitez B. [Utility of additional histological sections on prostatic needle biopsies with focal glandular atypia]. Actas Urol Esp. 2008; 32(6): 594-8[DOI]
  • 11. Rodriguez-Covarrubias F, Gonzalez-Ramirez A, Aguilar-Davidov B, Castillejos-Molina R, Sotomayor M, Feria-Bernal G. Extended sampling at first biopsy improves cancer detection rate: results of a prospective, randomized trial comparing 12 versus 18-core prostate biopsy. J Urol. 2012; 185(6): 2132-6[DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Chrisofos M, Papatsoris AG, Lazaris A, Deliveliotis C. Precursor lesions of prostate cancer. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2007; 44(3): 243-70[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Varma M, Linden MD, Amin MB. Effect of formalin fixation and epitope retrieval techniques on antibody 34betaE12 immunostaining of prostatic tissues. Mod Pathol. 1999; 12(5): 472-8[PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiaion Alert via Google Reader

Cited By:

Nephro-Urology Monthly accepts terms & conditions of:

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) Citedby Linking DOI enabled Crossref iThenticate COPE Cross Check