Nephro-Urology Monthly

Published by: Kowsar

outcomes and Safety of Retrograde Intra-Renal Surgery for Renal Stones less Than 2 cm in Size

Christopher Ho 1 , * , Tan Hee 1 , Goh Hong 1 , Praveen Singam 1 , Badrulhisham Bahadzor 1 and Zulkifli Zainuddin 1
Authors Information
1 Urology Unit, Department of Surgery, University Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala lumpur, Malaysia
Article information
  • Nephro-Urology Monthly: March 01, 2012, 4 (2); 454-457
  • Published Online: March 1, 2012
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: September 2, 2011
  • Revised: September 18, 2011
  • Accepted: September 25, 2011
  • DOI: 10.5812/numonthly.2211

To Cite: Ho C, Hee T, Hong G, Singam P, Bahadzor B, et al. outcomes and Safety of Retrograde Intra-Renal Surgery for Renal Stones less Than 2 cm in Size, Nephro-Urol Mon. 2012 ; 4(2):454-457. doi: 10.5812/numonthly.2211.

Abstract
Copyright © 2012, Nephrology and Urology Research Center. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Straub M, et al. Guidelines on urolithiasis. European Association of Urology. 2010;
  • 2. Lim SH, Jeong BC, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Han DH. Treatment outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones and predictive factors of stone-free. Korean J Urol. 2010; 51(11): 777-82[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Troy AJ, Anagnostou T, Tolley DA. Flexible upper tract endoscopy. BJU Int. 2004; 93(5): 671-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Ho CC, Hafidzul J, Praveen S, Goh Eh, Bong JJ, lee BC, et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones smaller than 2 cm. Singapore Med J. 2010; 51(6): 512-5
  • 5. Pearle MS, lingeman JE, leveillee R, Kuo R, Preminger GM, Nadler RB, et al. Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less. J Urol. 2005; 173(6): 2005-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Bozkurt OF, Resorlu B, Yildiz Y, Can CE, Unsal A. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of 15 to 20 mm. J Endourol. 2011; 25(7): 1131-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT, Lam JS, Schulam PG. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater--is this the new frontier? J Urol. 2008; 179(3): 981-4[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Holland R, Margel D, Livne PM, Lask DM, Lifshitz DA. Retrograde intrarenal surgery as second-line therapy yields a lower success rate. J Endourol. 2006; 20(8): 556-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Wong MY. Flexible ureteroscopy is the ideal choice to manage a 1.5 cm diameter lower-pole stone. J Endourol. 2008; 22(9): 1845-6
  • 10. Perlmutter AE, Talug C, Tarry WF, Zaslau S, Mohseni H, Kandzari SJ. Impact of stone location on success rates of endoscopic lithotripsy for nephrolithiasis. Urology. 2008; 71(2): 214-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Zarse CA, McAteer JA, Tann M, Sommer AJ, Kim SC, Paterson RF, et al. helical computed tomography accurately reports urinary stone composition using attenuation values: in vitro verification using high-resolution micro-computed tomography calibrated to fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy. Urology. 2004; 63(5): 828-33[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments