Nephro-Urology Monthly

Published by: Kowsar

Relationship Between Perineural Invasion in Prostate Needle Biopsy Specimens and Pathologic Staging After Radical Prostatectomy

Hassan Niroomand 1 , Mohammadreza Nowroozi 2 , Mohsen Ayati 2 , Hassan Jamshidian 2 , Amir Arbab 2 , Seyed Ali Momeni 2 , Alireza Ghadian 3 and Hamidreza Ghorbani 4 , *
Authors Information
1 Imam Reza Hospital, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
2 Uro-Oncology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
3 Nephrology and Urology Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
4 Imam Reza Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, IR Iran
Article information
  • Nephro-Urology Monthly: May 01, 2016, 8 (3); e36022
  • Published Online: March 16, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: January 3, 2016
  • Accepted: February 20, 2016
  • DOI: 10.5812/numonthly.36022

To Cite: Niroomand H, Nowroozi M, Ayati M, Jamshidian H, Arbab A, et al. Relationship Between Perineural Invasion in Prostate Needle Biopsy Specimens and Pathologic Staging After Radical Prostatectomy, Nephro-Urol Mon. 2016 ; 8(3):e36022. doi: 10.5812/numonthly.36022.

Abstract
Copyright © 2016, Nephrology and Urology Research Center. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnote
References
  • 1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010; 127(12): 2893-917[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Jemal A, Center MM, DeSantis C, Ward EM. Global patterns of cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010; 19(8): 1893-907[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Baade PD, Youlden DR, Krnjacki LJ. International epidemiology of prostate cancer: geographical distribution and secular trends. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2009; 53(2): 171-84[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Hsing AW, Tsao L, Devesa SS. International trends and patterns of prostate cancer incidence and mortality. Int J Cancer. 2000; 85(1): 60-7[PubMed]
  • 5. Quinn M, Babb P. Patterns and trends in prostate cancer incidence, survival, prevalence and mortality. Part II: individual countries. BJU Int. 2002; 90(2): 174-84[PubMed]
  • 6. Symon Z, Griffith KA, McLaughlin PW, Sullivan M, Sandler HM. Dose escalation for localized prostate cancer: substantial benefit observed with 3D conformal therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003; 57(2): 384-90[PubMed]
  • 7. de la Taille A, Katz A, Bagiella E, Olsson CA, O'Toole KM, Rubin MA. Perineural invasion on prostate needle biopsy: an independent predictor of final pathologic stage. Urology. 1999; 54(6): 1039-43[PubMed]
  • 8. Rubin MA, Mucci NR, Manley S, Sanda M, Cushenberry E, Strawderman M, et al. Predictors of Gleason pattern 4/5 prostate cancer on prostatectomy specimens: can high grade tumor be predicted preoperatively? J Urol. 2001; 165(1): 114-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Rubin MA, Bassily N, Sanda M, Montie J, Strawderman MS, Wojno K. Relationship and significance of greatest percentage of tumor and perineural invasion on needle biopsy in prostatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000; 24(2): 183-9[PubMed]
  • 10. Egan AJ, Bostwick DG. Prediction of extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer based on needle biopsy findings: perineural invasion lacks significance on multivariate analysis. Am J Surg Pathol. 1997; 21(12): 1496-500[PubMed]
  • 11. Ukimura O, Troncoso P, Ramirez EI, Babaian RJ. Prostate cancer staging: correlation between ultrasound determined tumor contact length and pathologically confirmed extraprostatic extension. J Urol. 1998; 159(4): 1251-9[PubMed]
  • 12. Vargas SO, Jiroutek M, Welch WR, Nucci MR, D'Amico AV, Renshaw AA. Perineural invasion in prostate needle biopsy specimens. Correlation with extraprostatic extension at resection. Am J Clin Pathol. 1999; 111(2): 223-8[PubMed]
  • 13. D'Amico AV, Wu Y, Chen MH, Nash M, Renshaw AA, Richie JP. Perineural invasion as a predictor of biochemical outcome following radical prostatectomy for select men with clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 2001; 165(1): 126-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. O'Malley KJ, Pound CR, Walsh PC, Epstein JI, Partin AW. Influence of biopsy perineural invasion on long-term biochemical disease-free survival after radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2002; 59(1): 85-90[PubMed]
  • 15. Freedland SJ, Csathy GS, Dorey F, Aronson WJ. Percent prostate needle biopsy tissue with cancer is more predictive of biochemical failure or adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy than prostate specific antigen or Gleason score. J Urol. 2002; 167(2 Pt 1): 516-20[PubMed]
  • 16. Bismar TA, Lewis JJ, Vollmer RT, Humphrey PA. Multiple measures of carcinoma extent versus perineural invasion in prostate needle biopsy tissue in prediction of pathologic stage in a screening population. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003; 27(4): 432-40[PubMed]
  • 17. Tsuzuki T, Hernandez DJ, Aydin H, Trock B, Walsh PC, Epstein JI. Prediction of extraprostatic extension in the neurovascular bundle based on prostate needle biopsy pathology, serum prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination. J Urol. 2005; 173(2): 450-3[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Cannon GJ, Pound CR, Landsittel DP, Bastacky SI, Dhir R, Becich MJ, et al. Perineural invasion in prostate cancer biopsies is not associated with higher rates of positive surgical margins. Prostate. 2005; 63(4): 336-40[DOI][PubMed]
  • 19. Sebo TJ, Cheville JC, Riehle DL, Lohse CM, Pankratz VS, Myers RP, et al. Predicting prostate carcinoma volume and stage at radical prostatectomy by assessing needle biopsy specimens for percent surface area and cores positive for carcinoma, perineural invasion, Gleason score, DNA ploidy and proliferation, and preoperative serum prostate specific antigen: a report of 454 cases. Cancer. 2001; 91(11): 2196-204[PubMed]
  • 20. Loeb S, Epstein JI, Humphreys EB, Walsh PC. Does perineural invasion on prostate biopsy predict adverse prostatectomy outcomes? BJU Int. 2010; 105(11): 1510-3[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. Bastacky SI, Walsh PC, Epstein JI. Relationship between perineural tumor invasion on needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy capsular penetration in clinical stage B adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Am J Surg Pathol. 1993; 17(4): 336-41[PubMed]
  • 22. Harnden P, Shelley MD, Clements H, Coles B, Tyndale-Biscoe RS, Naylor B, et al. The prognostic significance of perineural invasion in prostatic cancer biopsies: a systematic review. Cancer. 2007; 109(1): 13-24[DOI][PubMed]
  • 23. Thorson P, Vollmer RT, Arcangeli C, Keetch DW, Humphrey PA. Minimal carcinoma in prostate needle biopsy specimens: diagnostic features and radical prostatectomy follow-up. Mod Pathol. 1998; 11(6): 543-51[PubMed]
  • 24. Byar DP, Mostofi FK. Carcinoma of the prostate: prognostic evaluation of certain pathologic features in 208 radical prostatectomies. Examined by the step-section technique. Cancer. 1972; 30(1): 5-13[PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments