Nephro-Urology Monthly

Published by: Kowsar

Laparoscopic-Assisted Extracorporeal Pyeloplasty: A Minimally Invasive Approach to Pediatric Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction

Parisa Saeedi Sharifabad 1 , Mehran Hiradfar 1 , * , Reza Shojaeian 1 , ** , Alireza Sabzevari 1 and Nima Tarjoman 1
Authors Information
1 Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
Corresponding Authors:
Article information
  • Nephro-Urology Monthly: September 2018, 10 (5); e83823
  • Published Online: September 10, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: September 1, 2018
  • Accepted: September 5, 2018
  • DOI: 10.5812/numonthly.83823

To Cite: Saeedi Sharifabad P, Hiradfar M, Shojaeian R, Sabzevari A, Tarjoman N. et al. Laparoscopic-Assisted Extracorporeal Pyeloplasty: A Minimally Invasive Approach to Pediatric Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction, Nephro-Urol Mon. 2018 ; 10(5):e83823. doi: 10.5812/numonthly.83823.

Abstract
Copyright © 2018, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Peters GA. Congenital urinary obstructions. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Partin AW, Peters CA, editors. Campbell-Walsh urology. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2016. p. 3043-57.
  • 2. Turra F, Escolino M, Farina A, Settimi A, Esposito C, Varlet F. Pyeloplasty techniques using minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in pediatric patients. Transl Pediatr. 2016;5(4):251-5. doi: 10.21037/tp.2016.10.05. [PubMed: 27867848]. [PubMed Central: PMC5107382].
  • 3. Symons SJ, Palit V, Biyani CS, Cartledge JJ, Browning AJ, Joyce AD. Minimally invasive surgical options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A significant step in the right direction. Indian J Urol. 2009;25(1):27-33. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.45533. [PubMed: 19468425]. [PubMed Central: PMC2684299].
  • 4. Ekin RG, Celik O, Ilbey YO. An up-to-date overview of minimally invasive treatment methods in ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Cent European J Urol. 2015;68(2):245-51. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2015.543. [PubMed: 26251754]. [PubMed Central: PMC4526614].
  • 5. Umari P, Lissiani A, Trombetta C, Belgrano E. Comparison of open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in ureteropelvic junction obstruction surgery: report of 49 cases. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2011;83(4):169-74. [PubMed: 22670313].
  • 6. Yee DS, Shanberg AM, Duel BP, Rodriguez E, Eichel L, Rajpoot D. Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children. Urology. 2006;67(3):599-602. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.09.021. [PubMed: 16504272].
  • 7. Bonnard A, Fouquet V, Carricaburu E, Aigrain Y, El-Ghoneimi A. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children. J Urol. 2005;173(5):1710-3. discussion 1713. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000154169.74458.32. [PubMed: 15821565].
  • 8. Wu JT, Gao ZL, Shi L, Han BM, Men CP, Zhang P, et al. Small incision combined with laparoscopy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Comparison with retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Chin Med J (Engl). 2009;122(22):2728-32. [PubMed: 19951604].
  • 9. Zhang X, Li HZ, Ma X, Zheng T, Lang B, Zhang J, et al. Retrospective comparison of retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol. 2006;176(3):1077-80. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.04.073. [PubMed: 16890694].
  • 10. Tong Q, Zheng L, Tang S, Zeng F, Du Z, Mei H, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted versus open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants: Intermediate results. Urology. 2009;74(4):889-93. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.03.053. [PubMed: 19628268].
  • 11. Casale P, Grady RW, Joyner BD, Zeltser IS, Figueroa TE, Mitchell ME. Comparison of dismembered and nondismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric patient. J Endourol. 2004;18(9):875-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2004.18.875. [PubMed: 15659924].
  • 12. Caione P, Lais A, Nappo SG. One-port retroperitoneoscopic assisted pyeloplasty versus open dismembered pyeloplasty in young children: preliminary experience. J Urol. 2010;184(5):2109-15. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.126. [PubMed: 20851429].
  • 13. Ravish IR, Nerli RB, Reddy MN, Amarkhed SS. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty compared with open pyeloplasty in children. J Endourol. 2007;21(8):897-902. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0411. [PubMed: 17867949].
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments